Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
×
Español (España) | English
Editorial
Home
Indexing
Original

Is the SCRIPT an useful tool to assess clinical reasoning ability in medical students?

By
Yanina Estefanía Belén Xammar ,
Yanina Estefanía Belén Xammar

Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Lorena Djament ,
Lorena Djament

Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Numerous investigations indicate that the way of evaluating knowledge exerts a substantial influence on the change in the learning styles of students. Both the training of future professionals and their evaluation must be considered as one of the fundamental pillars on which the teaching-learning process must be based. The valid and reliable evaluation of clinical reasoning during the medical training process is essential. Determining which assessment method is the most useful for assessing clinical reasoning ability in medical students is not an easy task.
Methods: An explanatory, observational, cross-sectional study with a prospective approach will be carried out. A SCRIPT test will be carried out on the students of the last year of the Medicine career, in order to measure the reliability, validity, educational impact and acceptability of said method.
Results: Evaluations were carried out on a total of 81 students.59.3% were women and 40.7% were men. The general average of all those surveyed, taking into account deferrals, is 7.41. After having uploaded the data obtained and giving the corresponding score to each answer, according to the value designated by the experts, we have obtained a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.33.
Conclusion: The results obtained in this study, although the authors propose a minimum of 20 clinical vignettes, were not the expected. Both the utility and the reliability of the SCRIPT tests are not sufficient by themselves to allow a correct evaluation of clinical analysis in medical students. We believe it is necessary that clinical reasoning be evaluated in an integrated, longitudinal, and coherent manner, using multiple evaluation methods and periodic and constructive feedback.

How to Cite

1.
Xammar YEB, Djament L. Is the SCRIPT an useful tool to assess clinical reasoning ability in medical students?. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 23 [cited 2024 Jul. 6];1:25. Available from: https://dm.saludcyt.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/57

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.