Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
×
Español (España) | English
Editorial
Home
Indexing
Original

Analysis of scientific information from a bibliometric approach between Chat GPT and Scopus: A comparative study

By
Ana Karen Romero ,
Ana Karen Romero

Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración. Sinaloa, México

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Deyanira Bernal ,
Deyanira Bernal

Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración. Sinaloa, México

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Reyna Christian Sánchez ,
Reyna Christian Sánchez

Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Sinaloa, México

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the main challenges faced by teachers, researchers, and students today is efficiently filtering reliable and useful information available on the internet, as well as in scientific academic databases. To address this phenomenon, the bibliometrics tool is used, which involves understanding the number of publications, analyzing them, and determining their trend based on the application of filters and relationships of scientific concepts in specialized topics. There are other technological tools that allow finding bibliographic information on the internet, such as artificial intelligence (AI) specifically through the ChatGPT chatbot (Generative Pre-trained transformer). The objective of this article is to identify the differences between the results of a bibliometric analysis from Scopus and ChatGPT; the research type is documentary; the search strategy for the bibliometric analysis was "Dynamic Capabilities." Findings show that there are differences between the data obtained from the two bibliometric analyses, including authors, subject areas, affiliations, and keywords; it should be noted that the use of ChatGPT is a basic and simple tool that complements the bibliometric analysis provided by an academic database like Scopus; it is suggested to compare the results analytically and manually at all times, which is of interest to academia and the development of theoretical frameworks in research work.

How to Cite

1.
Romero A karen, Bernal D, Sanchez RC. Analysis of scientific information from a bibliometric approach between Chat GPT and Scopus: A comparative study. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2024 May 5 [cited 2024 May 24];3:252. Available from: https://dm.saludcyt.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/252

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.