Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Español (España) | English
Editorial
Revistas / Journals
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Home
Issue
Current Issue Previous Issues Special Issue
About
About the Journal Editorial Team Privacy Statement Digital preservation policy Contact
Submissions
Author Guidelines Peer Review Process Ethical aspects Open Access Policy and Copyright Anti-plagiarism policy Crossmark policy page
Indexing
×
Español (España) | English
Editorial

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Home

Current Issue Previous Issues Special Issue

About the Journal Editorial Team Privacy Statement Digital preservation policy Contact

Author Guidelines Peer Review Process Ethical aspects Open Access Policy and Copyright Anti-plagiarism policy Crossmark policy page
Indexing
Original
Published: 2023-02-26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20237

Scientific production on dialogical pedagogy: a bibliometric analysis

By
Yanir Bayona Arévalo ,
Yanir Bayona Arévalo

Universidad de Pamplona. Pamplona, Colombia

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Matilde Bolaño García ,
Matilde Bolaño García

Universidad del Magdalena, Facultad Ciencias de la Educación. Santa Marta, Colombia

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

Paulo Freire's dialogical pedagogy provides teachers with a framework for their professional practice, offering educators strategies for teaching and learning. The main objective of this research is to determine the contributions of Paulo Freire's dialogical pedagogy to teaching praxis from bibliometric analysis, in terms of increasing impact and incidence in educational processes, knowing its structure, production, and utilization of information for pedagogical practices. A descriptive bibliometric study in Scopus database was conducted, applying a technique of exploratory and descriptive bibliographic document collection to analyze research related to the research topics. A total of 781 documents were retrieved from the Scopus database on the topic under study, of which 32,5% were open access, involving 1317 authors, with an average of 8,1 citations per document (1,42 Field-Weighted Citation Impact). Original articles represented three-quarters of the total documents, indicating research with new contributions to knowledge, while 12.4% were book chapters and the remaining 11.8% were Reviews, Books, Conference Papers, Editorials, and Errata. The top 10 countries with the highest number of published documents in the research area are the United States, United Kingdom and Australia. The analysis carried out revealed that there is significant progress in the area of research related to dialogic pedagogy and its scientific evolution.

Keywords:

Pedagogía,
Bibliometría,
Producción científica,
Paulo Freire,
Dialogical pedagogy,

How to Cite

1.
Bayona Arévalo Y, Bolaño García M. Scientific production on dialogical pedagogy: a bibliometric analysis. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2023 Feb. 26 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];2:7. Available from: https://dm.saludcyt.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/7

Copyright Notice

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Vol. 2 (2023)
See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.